"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Currently, it seems that most or all of the entries are links to >> archived messages. Scraping the date from the underlying message >> would be the best thing. > Just for purposes of conversion, or as a long-term behavior? Well, right at the moment I was just thinking of the conversion problem, but it wouldn't be a horrible idea to make it a permanent behavior for entries that include a message reference. regards, tom lane