- Previous thread: [PATCH] powerpc/perf_counter: POWER7 has alternate PR/HV bits
- Next thread: winner
- Threads sorted by date: kernel 200906
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:45 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> BTW, printing it all the time we can spam kmemleak (in case there are objects sized 2K, 4K and so on).
> That's why I wrote about hexdump=OBJECT_POINTER.
I'm more in favour of an on/off hexdump feature (maybe even permanently
on) and with a limit to the number of bytes it displays. For larger
blocks, the hexdump=OBJECT_POINTER is easily achievable in user space
via /dev/kmem.
My proposal is for an always on hexdump but with no more than 2-3 lines
of hex values. As Pekka said, I should get it into linux-next before the
next merging window.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> BTW, printing it all the time we can spam kmemleak (in case there are objects sized 2K, 4K and so on).
> That's why I wrote about hexdump=OBJECT_POINTER.
I'm more in favour of an on/off hexdump feature (maybe even permanently
on) and with a limit to the number of bytes it displays. For larger
blocks, the hexdump=OBJECT_POINTER is easily achievable in user space
via /dev/kmem.
My proposal is for an always on hexdump but with no more than 2-3 lines
of hex values. As Pekka said, I should get it into linux-next before the
next merging window.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Conversations: kmemleak hexdump proposal
- kmemleak hexdump proposal by Sergey Senozhatsky on 2009-06-28T17:35:28+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Pekka Enberg on 2009-06-29T09:43:32+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Catalin Marinas on 2009-06-29T09:49:43+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Sergey Senozhatsky on 2009-06-29T10:17:56+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Pekka Enberg on 2009-06-29T10:19:54+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Catalin Marinas on 2009-06-29T10:40:10+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Pekka Enberg on 2009-06-29T10:42:34+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Sergey Senozhatsky on 2009-06-29T10:44:34+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Sergey Senozhatsky on 2009-06-29T10:51:29+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Catalin Marinas on 2009-06-29T10:59:01+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Sergey Senozhatsky on 2009-06-29T11:06:49+00:00
- Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal by Sergey Senozhatsky on 2009-06-29T20:08:56+00:00
Related Threads
- How to repeat AST/Generic analysis - gcc
- [grails-user] countrySelect question - grails
- Real MO and MT throughput - kannel
- Hash of Hash of Arrays Question - ruby
- pppd in a vserver - debian
- mrapichai is sending you an invitation to weblin - openbsd
- [PATCH 0/20] powerpc: base 64-bit Book3E processor support (v2) - linuxppc
- [sqlite] Subtotal SQL - sqlite
- [grails-user] Controller without domain - grails
- Porting GCC 4.4.0 to interix - gcc