Re: Refine rules for function versioning

by H.J. Luon 2009-06-27T13:59:42+00:00
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I'll commit this.
>
> Paolo
>
> Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> --- testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp =A0 =A0 =A0(revision 149005)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp =A0 =A0 =A0(working copy)
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
> =A0# With -O3.
> =A0# Don't allow IPA cloning, because it throws our counts out of whack.
> =A0set DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS $SAVED_DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS
> -lappend DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS "-O3 -fno-ipa-cp-clone"
> +lappend DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS "-O3" "-fno-ipa-cp-clone"
> =A0if =A0[istarget "spu-*-*"] {
> =A0 lappend DEFAULT_VECTCFLAGS "-funroll-loops"
> =A0}
>
Does this fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D40567
--=20
H.J.

Conversations: Refine rules for function versioning